Closed maxbriel closed 7 months ago
Can you also please add the ID of the system and where the relevant population datafile can be found?
The this binary can be found in the population datafile at 230914/POSYDON_data/tutorials/population-synthesis/example/1.00e-01_Zsun_population.h5
.
It is the binary with binary_index
63
I just checked, and it looks like currently the CO_RLO_HMS grid has a maximum compact object mass of 52 Msun, expanding to cover at least this BH mass would require us to go from 22 grid slices on M_CO to 28 grid slices, or a ~25% increase in overall size. This seems worth it to me...
On a separate note, I did not realize that we can form 150 Msun BHs at 0.1 Sun. This seems high to me. Is there something else going on here that we should be considering (i.e., what's going on with the winds)?
To help with the last point, here's the total mass evolution of the closest model for the primary at different metallicities. (ZAMS mass = 172.00314763 $M_\odot$)
The total number of systems undergoing this error per metallicity
Metallicity [$Z_\odot$] | Total binaries | Err. # | Err. % |
---|---|---|---|
10$^{-4}$ | 1000000 | 651 | 0.0651 |
10$^{-3}$ | 1000000 | 740 | 0.074 |
10$^{-2}$ | 985294 | 1036 | 0.105 |
10$^{-1}$ | 1000000 | 746 | 0.0746 |
2 x 10$^{-1}$ | 1000000 | 490 | 0.049 |
4.5 x 10$^{-1}$ | 1000000 | 76 | 0.0076 |
1 | 1000000 | 510 | 0.051 |
2 | 1000000 | 716 | 0.0716 |
In the example population, theses are the maximum BH masses formed. These are filtered to not be merged or disrupted systems.
metallicity |
Maximum BH mass at step SN |
---|---|
2 $Z_\odot$ | 20.14001937440778 |
1 $Z_\odot$ | 29.727357640553727 |
0.2 $Z_\odot$ | 43.88486714438659 |
4.5 $Z_\odot$ | 44.121391054958146 |
0.1 $Z_\odot$ | 214.90970040335225 |
0.01 $Z_\odot$ | 289.15697913890654 |
0.001 $Z_\odot$ | 295.68184016494564 |
0.0001 $Z_\odot$ | 303.89610508155533 |
Done in PR #222 .
Please add this change for the other CO gird, too.
@maxbriel could you please check, whether this issue can be closed after PR #239 got merged.
This issue is solved with the temporary solution in PR #239. $Z = 0.1 Z_\odot$
STAR1 = SingleStar(**{'mass': 170.638207,
'state': 'H-rich_Core_H_burning',
'natal_kick_array':[5.252975716982831, 2.9130465526555263, 1.8590029365249685, 6.154738614785131]})
STAR2 = SingleStar(**{'mass'37.917852,
'state': 'H-rich_Core_H_burning'})
BINARY = BinaryStar(STAR1, STAR2,
**{'time': 0.0, 'state': 'detached', 'event': 'ZAMS', 'orbital_period':113.352736, 'eccentricity': 0.0},
properties = sim_pop)
The above binary would loop. Now it fails with ValueError: CO_HMS_RLO binary outside grid and coming from detached
.
Problem A binary with a massive BH outside the
CO_HMS
grid mass will get redirect to thedetached
step. However, if the binary then experiences RLOF, it will be moved to theCO_HMS
grid at RLOF, where it falls outside the grid and gets redirected back todetached
. Since this binary is undergoing RLOF, it gets put back toCO_HMS
. This causes a cyclical process. This process repeats itself several times with a different number of repetitions for different binaries.Interestingly, the period reduces slightly every time it goes from
step_CO_HMS_RLO
->step_detached
. Tides?Solution Temporary: Stop the systems from being send to the CO_HMS grid if they already came from there? Actual solution: extend the secondary grid to include such massive BHs.
etc etc