Closed tsalo closed 12 months ago
One additional difference is that init_asl_t1_trans_wf
calls the ASL reference workflow, which in turn uses aslcontext
.
I have a plan: I will call the BOLD versions, but ignore the reference image output. Then I will call the ASL-specific reference workflow in the main workflow instead.
Summary
The main difference between ASLPrep's
init_asl_t1_trans_wf
and fMRIPrep'sinit_bold_t1_trans_wf
is the list of native-space files to warp to T1w space. ASLPrep has ASL versions of many of the same files (ref_bold_brain
,ref_bold_mask
,t1w_brain
,t1w_mask
,t1w_aseg
,t1w_aparc
,bold_split
), but it also has a bunch of CBF outputs to warp as well.If the workflow could ingest multiple native-space inputs without having to specify them in the function, then ASLPrep could directly use fMRIPrep's function (perhaps moved to niworkflows?).