Open slifty opened 1 month ago
Authoritative answer: "changemaker", with capitalization like a regular English word. Internally we may use the "CM" abbreviation sometimes, but the public-facing word is "changemaker".
(Source: Julie Hoffman in Slack just now, replying to Karl: "changemaker with capitalization like any other English word. thanks!!")
I am going to take this on now since it impacts the work for #1116
Short term update on this -- I'm pausing for a moment just to make 100% final sure we want Changemaker
(vs, say, applicant
).
The considerations here is that we don't want a term that might not last, since this has impact on API endpoints and data beyond just being used internally in a lot of ways. I expect to hear back tomorrow!
In the meantime, back to provenance 😅
I would lean more to keep it Organization
for now. Not something I would think we should try and mess with, for now, since changemaker is not super-universally known/understood.
@jmergy What about Applicant
or Grantseeker
? (This would only show up in internal code and in the API; it has no effect on what's presented on the front end.)
IMHO, Organization
has become too generic. We now have other organizational entities represented in the PDC, such as funders and data providers. So we probably don't want to use "organization" internally for changemaker -- those other things are organizations too, so it would be confusing: why do we use the generic word "organization" for one kind of organization, while using more-specific words for other kinds of organizations?
We could solve this with Applicant
or Grantseeker
(technically, the letter is the most accurate, since not every grant happens as the result of an application process, but I think either one is fine).
Thoughts?
We currently store an entity called
Organization
(as opposed toProposal
)On call today @kfogel suggested we should make this more specific:
ChangeMaker
This seems like a reasonable idea, especially as we are about to add new entity types that represent "organizations" (in a real world sense) and they are distinct from Organization/ChangeMaker.
Implementing this change would mean adjusting our endpoints in a breaking way; that's OK to do, but it is something we should try to only do once if we can help it. The bottom line question to me is: "is ChangeMaker a forever term?"