Open laxamanaj opened 10 months ago
As a follow-up to the discussions in the WG meeting, would be it useful to include a file with check sums (e.g. MD5 sums) for all the files in this package? It could be useful in identifying any differences post downloaded.
As a follow-up to the discussions in the WG meeting, would be it useful to include a file with check sums (e.g. MD5 sums) for all the files in this package? It could be useful in identifying any differences post downloaded.
Thanks, @saghirb . Are you talking about running this : https://rdrr.io/r/tools/md5sum.html
As a follow-up to the discussions in the WG meeting, would be it useful to include a file with check sums (e.g. MD5 sums) for all the files in this package? It could be useful in identifying any differences post downloaded.
Thanks, @saghirb . Are you talking about running this : https://rdrr.io/r/tools/md5sum.html
@laxamanaj yes I am. I use it in conjunction with list.files()
to write (via a data.frame) a .md5
file that contains hashes and respective filenames. On Unix based OSes you can verify the integrity of files (data) using md5sum -c filename.md5
.
If it helps, I am happy to provide example code.
Thanks for your patience in my response @saghirb . Sure , would be interested in a sample code you may have to share. Thanks!
Apologies for the delay in my response @laxamanaj. I have created a GitHub repo with some Demo code for tools:md5sum
at:
Let me know if this helps or if it is not clear.
From the R Consortium R Submissions WG meeting on 03Nov2023, some feedback was given to Pilot 3 submission :
renv::install()
when using Rv4.2.1, but did install when reviewer was using Rv4.2.3.adam-pilot-3.xlsx
, this wasn't updated in our ADaM programs to match the file name appropriately. Reviewers were able to update the file name convention appropriately and adsl.r ran fine.Action : to include these notes in the minutes.