Open Cashe93 opened 3 years ago
Existing Capacity
Existing Dam Size
Historic Dam Capacity
Unsuitable or Limited Opportunities
Risk of Undesirable Dams
Restoration or Conservation Opportunities
Perennial Network
Zero or Null DA (No good example for this HUC)
Slope
Drainage Area
High Flow Stream Power
Base Flow Stream Power
Existing Veg Dam Building Suitability
Historic Veg Dam Building Suitability
Existing Vegetation Suitability
Historic Vegetation Suitability
Priority Beaver Translocation Areas
Land Ownership Per Reach
Land Use Intensity
Distance to Nearest Infrastructure
Distance to Railroad
Distance to Railroad in Valley Bottom
Distance to Road
Distance to Road Crossing
Distance to Road in Valley Bottom
Distance to Points of Diversion
Distance to Canals/Ditches
Network
Flow Direction
River Polygons
Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs and Waterbodies
Veg Type - EVT Class
Veg Type - EVT Name
Existing Riparian
Veg Type - BPS Name
Historic Riparian
Slope
DEM
Hillshade
Everything displays with proper symbology.
@Cashe93 The Unsuitable or Limited Opportunities layer is not displaying "Potential Reservoir or Landuse Change" It looks like this is because in the attribute table it the attribute for this is "Potential Reservoir or Landuse" (doesn't have "change"). So that symbology will need to be updated.
Nice find, @CHafen! I've looked into this, and it should be fixed with my next pull request.
@Cashe93 it looks like for the zero or null drainage area the null is not showing up in Arc. I was looking at HUC 10190010. There's only a small spot that has the null, but it's showing up in Q but not Arc (see images). Other than that everything I looked at seemed good
BRAT in ArcRAVE Project Type: BRAT Layer(s): All (Vectors and Raster) Project Tested: https://northarrowresearchlabs.github.io/webrave-staging/#/Anabranch/ecd62e99-c4e8-4b09-b788-383951ab7ef6