Closed ctobalsk closed 5 years ago
Yep.... We're really backed up on documentation these days and are punting on that until we get through testing the beta releases of 3.2 and we are happy with the outputs to the point that code development has slowed down. In meantime, check out enhancement issues in forum, which describe the fields and algorithm...
Sent from a little phone
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 3:34 PM Claudine Tobalske notifications@github.com wrote:
pyBRAT 3.0.20 generates several fields for which I can't find a definition anywhere: mCC_HisDep, oPBRC_UI, oPBRC_UD, and oPBRC_CR. We're writing the report that will go with the Montana BRAT and would really appreciate something similar to the format in this table: http://brat.riverscapes.xyz/Documentation/Tutorials/WorkingWithBRATOutputs.html Thank!
Claudine
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Riverscapes/pyBRAT/issues/214, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJRgAfEGyxIXewdmwL_Td6_XHxs0VkaIks5uoOrvgaJpZM4X5La- .
Thanks Joe, I'll do that. This is totally unrelated, but I am wondering why several steps of the model generates a new shapefile (e.g. Combined, Conservation, Summary Report) instead of simply adding fields to the attribute table, as is the case of iHyd for example?
pyBRAT 3.0.20 generates several fields for which I can't find a definition anywhere: mCC_HisDep, oPBRC_UI, oPBRC_UD, and oPBRC_CR. We're writing the report that will go with the Montana BRAT and would really appreciate something similar to the format in this table: http://brat.riverscapes.xyz/Documentation/Tutorials/WorkingWithBRATOutputs.html Thank!
Claudine