Closed SuhasSrinivasan closed 8 months ago
POTENTIAL WORKAROUND
Setting a different condition
for the sample with only one replicate works and is better than using contiguous values for rep
.
libtype stage rep condition
1: RFP Cardio 1 CHX
2: RFP Cardio 2 CHX
3: RFP Cardio 3 CHX
4: RFP Cardio 1 Harr
5: RFP iPSC 1 CHX
6: RFP iPSC 2 CHX
7: RFP iPSC 3 CHX
8: RFP iPSC 1 Harr
Great, will take a look at these today/monday, but for now, your "workaround" is the way I intend it to be made. Harr is a feature, so it should be included to make the experimental design unique.
Depending on your goal, the best thing is always to put the major factor of interest into condition column. So set stage as empty, condition as Cardio/iPSC and put treatment into fraction column. That is what I usually do at least :)
There is now a much better error text for this, I also added some more tests for valid experiments. Pushed to master branch on github.
Open a new issue if there is something else
Hello again, sorry for reporting so many issues. Maybe this error is an edge case.
Help would be much appreciated!
Full error
There are no duplicate rows and the issue persists even after providing values for
replicate
,stage
andcondition
. Initiallystage
andcondition
were partially filled by the automated parsing.PROBLEMATIC WORKAROUND Issue can only be resolved if
rep
column has continuous values1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4
but this does not reflect the actual replicate numbers. The fourth sample in Cardio and iPSC are Harringtonine treated.P.S. Will be great to know which column is causing the issue. Also, suggested change in error message