Better to have the inverse of cv:playsRole?

SEMICeu / CPSV-AP

Repository for the specifications falling under CPSV-AP

26 stars 9 forks source link

Better to have the inverse of cv:playsRole? #110

Closed jimjyang closed 1 year ago

jimjyang commented 1 year ago

Currently, the class foaf:Agent has a property cv:playsRole with range cv:Participation.

Wouldn't it be "more natural" to have the property the other way: cv:Participation cv:rolePlayedBy foaf:Agent?

This may also make it easier to implement, in the way that you don't need to scan all the instances of foaf:Agent in order to know who plays role in which participation.

williamverbeeck commented 1 year ago

During the webinar on the review of CPSV-AP on the 7th of November, it was agreed to:

Restrict participates 1..* and hasParticipant 1..1.
Use "participates" instead of "playsRole".

EmidioStani commented 1 year ago

This issue can be closed, it is solved in the new release: https://semiceu.github.io/CPSV-AP/releases/3.1.0/