Closed homnath closed 2 months ago
I think it is unrelated to my change but it failing at testing Example 4 which runs fine on my part!
maybe an issue with array allocation and array size when receivers become (adjoint) sources in pure adjoint simulations...
some suggestions:
USE_OTHER_TIME_FUNCTION
to USE_BRUNE_TIME_FUNCTION
? for now, this flag seems to turn on a feature specific for Brune-type STFs, and no "other" STFs.test/
example in the EXAMPLES/applications/
folder. please rename it as well to give it a more specific meaning, the application title "test" is too general.Thanks, Daniel! I will have a look 🙂
From: daniel peter @.> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 9:11 AM To: SPECFEM/specfem3d @.> Cc: Hom Nath Gharti @.>; State change @.> Subject: Re: [SPECFEM/specfem3d] Devel Added new parameter USE_OTHER_TIME_FUNCTION (PR #1691)
maybe an issue with array allocation and array size when receivers become (adjoint) sources in pure adjoint simulations...
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SPECFEM/specfem3d/pull/1691#issuecomment-2077148057, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMCQ4QHFTVUFVJDRR7INNTY7D6JXAVCNFSM6AAAAABGOG3C6GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZXGE2DQMBVG4. You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>
Added Brune and Smoothed Brune source time function for CMTSOLUTION via new parameter USE_OTHER_TIME_FUNCTION.