Closed jesusbv closed 3 months ago
Before this gets merged, someone from the SCC team needs to approve the stubbed SCC requests & responses.
Any further comments I have are purely stylistic.
so, all the changes left are more cosmetic than adding/removing functionality, am I wrong ?
if I understood it right, then we can merge this PR so we can move on to the next PR
and have a subsequent PR (once all the LTSS functionality is merged) to refactor auth
on scc_proxy
engine
Thoughts ?
Description
Update scc_proxy engine to support LTSS scenario
How to test
On a registered PAYG instance, adding LTSS extension with a valid registration code must succeed
Change Type
Please select the correct option.
Checklist
Please check off each item if the requirement is met.
MANUAL.md
file with any changes to the user experience.package/obs/rmt-server.changes
.Review
Please check out our review guidelines and get in touch with the author to get a shared understanding of the change.