Peer-review 2

[hcolmanccc]

The Sage notebook shows examples of using various Sage commands to implement objects and methods encountered in elementary combinatorics. This is done very nicely but the result is not a a tool to learn math as the title claims, but a friendly user manual.

[Samuel-Lubliner]

When the reviewer says "Sage notebook", are they referring to the entire book, or this referring to a specific section?

Should we change the title to include something along the lines of user manual? Should we remove the word "learn"?

This has me thinking of some more options for a fitting title.

Do we want to start the title with SageMath or Discrete Math?

• If we want to emphasize Sage then we can say: "SageMath for Discrete Mathematics: {subtitle}"

• If we want to emphasize Discrete Math we can say "Discrete Math with SageMath: {subtitle}"

Some possible subtitles:

• A Practical Guide
• A Hands-On User Manual

Another thought about the title: Do we want to keep "with open-source software" to emphasize the importance of Sage as an alternative to proprietary options. Or, does this make the title too long?

@hcolmanccc @zunaidahmed96

[hcolmanccc]

I like this choice:

"SageMath for Discrete Mathematics: {subtitle}"

since this gives a pattern for others like "SageMath for Calculus: ", etc.

I like the subtitle as it is. But it could be a good alternative too to use either of your two choices as subtitle.