Closed kimlongcr closed 2 weeks ago
To clarify, it actually says “No matching groups found.”
We too see this behavior, but assumed it was intentional to show everyone in a family (the lack of which in legacy checkin often confuses people) but not allow ineligible people to check in.
If this is intended behavior, it would be nice if there were a config setting to choose between the new and old behavior, though.
And, change the language so that the community member understands. They don't know what a group is in regards to checkin or their family.
The current logic is intentional. During our initial discussions with churches, they expressed a preference for not hiding individuals without check-in options from the list.
However, we’re adding a new setting (in v16.7) to allow hiding people based on their Age Classification
(a property of the Person
model). This setting will have three options:
Additionally, we’ll adjust the message to read, No Eligible Options Found
.
We appreciate your feedback—it’s helping us fine-tune these features to better meet your needs.
Description
When using the Check-In page adults are included in the list of people in the family to check-in. Next to the adults is the message "Matching Group Found" and the adults are not selectable.
Actual Behavior
When using the Check-In page adults are included in the list of people in the family to check-in. Next to the adults is the message "Matching Group Found" and the adults are not selectable.
Expected Behavior
Adults are not included in the Check-In screen for Children.
Steps to Reproduce
Issue Confirmation
Rock Version
Rock McKinley 16.7 (1.16.7.2)
Client Culture Setting
en-US