Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Just so I understand--is the new interface logging the existence of these atoms
because we didn't inform mp4v2 that they were expected?
Original comment by jnor...@logitech.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 12:57
Right.
Here's a sample.
Original comment by damiog
on 8 Feb 2011 at 7:11
Attachments:
Looks good--I'll try and get this in sometime today.
Original comment by jnor...@logitech.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 5:08
I tried the patch and it removes a bunch of warnings but there's still one left
about a 'jpeg' atom. We handle that with MP4VideoAtom (atom_video.cpp) but I
don't see a note in the wiki
(http://code.google.com/p/mp4v2/wiki/iTunesMetadata) about it. Anyone know
enough to write an entry for it? Either way it looks like I should add
ExpectChildAtom("jpeg", Optional...);
I guess the last arg should be OnlyOne but would nice to get someone to confirm.
Thanks.
-DB
Original comment by dbyr...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2011 at 8:30
Oh that's unrelated. It's from a jpeg track.
But I'll send soon (maybe) a different patch for it.
Original comment by damiog
on 8 Feb 2011 at 8:32
Thanks for the patch, sorry for the delay. It's in now. Let me know if you
get the other patch for the jpeg track and I'll work on that one next.
hopefully my turnaround time won't be a month this time... :(
Original comment by kid...@gmail.com
on 17 Mar 2011 at 11:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
damiog
on 7 Feb 2011 at 8:24Attachments: