I decided to try out this utility on my workstation which seems to bottleneck on single core during file copying and so far results that I'm getting are extremely disappointing at best.
Using traditional cp utility resulted in copying file in around 8:10 (~996 MB/s), while fcp accomplished the same task in 9:39 (~843 MB/s).
Of course both results are extremely disappointing considering it's copying from NVME Gen4 RAID1 to different NVME Gen4 RAID1 which has theoretical throughput of around 14 GB/s read and 6 GB/s write (used drives are FireCuda 530 and Samsung 990 PRO and they don't have any problem with reaching advertised speeds during fio seq i/o benchmarks)
It's worth to point out that in both cases neither cp nor fcp exceeded 100% of single core usage which corresponds to negligible CPU usage on 24c/48t Threadripper workstation. Disks are far from being 100% utilized and in matter of fact it's possible to hack bash script that achieves higher performance for copying single file.
size=`du -m "$1" | grep -o "^[0-9]\+"`
threads=8
block=1000
count=$((size/block/threads+1))
for t in `seq 0 $((threads-1))` ; do
o=$((t*count))
echo dd if="$1" of="$2" iseek=$o oseek=$o bs=${block}M count=$count
(dd if="$1" of="$2" iseek=$o oseek=$o bs=${block}M count=$count) &
done
wait
this thing copies the same file in 5:24 (~1507 MB/s) and hammers disks utility to 100% :/
I'm not sure where to start troubleshooting. All those results are very pathetic considering raw SSDs performance.
Hi
I decided to try out this utility on my workstation which seems to bottleneck on single core during file copying and so far results that I'm getting are extremely disappointing at best.
Using traditional
cp
utility resulted in copying file in around 8:10 (~996 MB/s), while fcp accomplished the same task in 9:39 (~843 MB/s).Of course both results are extremely disappointing considering it's copying from NVME Gen4 RAID1 to different NVME Gen4 RAID1 which has theoretical throughput of around 14 GB/s read and 6 GB/s write (used drives are FireCuda 530 and Samsung 990 PRO and they don't have any problem with reaching advertised speeds during
fio
seq i/o benchmarks)It's worth to point out that in both cases neither
cp
norfcp
exceeded 100% of single core usage which corresponds to negligible CPU usage on 24c/48t Threadripper workstation. Disks are far from being 100% utilized and in matter of fact it's possible to hack bash script that achieves higher performance for copying single file.this thing copies the same file in 5:24 (~1507 MB/s) and hammers disks utility to 100% :/
I'm not sure where to start troubleshooting. All those results are very pathetic considering raw SSDs performance.