Closed guyellis closed 4 years ago
Hey @guyellis I think .has
is not implemented.
Any reason to use .has
instead of .items
?
Actually I haven't used .has
myself, and I am not sure how it would map to a type since the implementation says that it is valid if at least one of array items match the schema.
@TCMiranda - no reason not to use items - that works - thanks!
I'm getting the error described in the comments at the bottom of the example below which is also available in a repo here.
Am I just approaching this incorrectly or is this something that can be fixed in this repo?