Open KK-kaku opened 1 year ago
The example you gave is from a user with no owned sentences and no comments, who may have either mistakenly reviewed the sentence, or intentionally considered it as incorrect. Why should one user's mistaken review cause the whole group of non-native reviewers to be impeded?
What you are asking for is hundreds, if not thousands of reviews that will mostly be correct to be erased from the platform. That is an extremely destructive action with a only single flawed piece of evidence provided to justify it.
I agree with @vxern. It looks like that particular review gets into the way of corpus maintainers who use this feature to keep track of sentences that need to be changed. I believe this is the actual reason this issue was opened, but maybe @KK-kaku can confirm?
I believe non-natives having a good-enough understanding of the language are also capable of flagging sentences with "not OK" or "unsure".
The problem could be solved in a way that does not prevent such contributions.
I think the main issue here is that corpus maintainers don't have a way to remove outdated or faulty reviews from other users, and I feel like they should. That would resolve this issue I believe.
Perhaps the title should be changed to.
"Make it possible for Corpus Maintainers to edit reviews"
This would allow Corpus Maintainers to eliminate these kinds of errors, and also fix errors that appear when Horus moves bad ratings from a corrected sentence to a pre-existing matching sentence.
Changed the title.
Story Reviews by non-native speakers are often incorrect, and there is no way to tell a native review from a non-native review on the sentence page.
Example https://tatoeba.org/ja/sentences/show/3459009 This sentence is perfectly correct, but a non-native speaker has added an incorrect "Not OK" review.
Idea All reviews made by non-native speakers should be deleted. Reviewing sentences in non-native languages should be disabled by the system.