codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 54.01%. Comparing base (
3124e49) to head (9a548eb). Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #975 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 54.00% 54.01% +0.01% =========================================== Files 177 177 Lines 19428 19428 =========================================== + Hits 10492 10494 +2 + Misses 8936 8934 -2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/TheDeanLab/navigate/pull/975/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=TheDeanLab) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/TheDeanLab/navigate/pull/975/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=TheDeanLab) | `54.01% <ø> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=TheDeanLab#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This was a mistake on my behalf. I added this dependency thinking it was a built-in...