Closed nfriedly closed 2 years ago
should we keep its name as "miyooctl"? or should we rename to "control" or something like that? i mean, naming miyoo
should we keep its name as "miyooctl"? or should we rename to "control" or something like that? i mean, naming miyoo is very repetitive, and we doesnt have miyooboot, miyookernel, just its names, what do you think? because this is an exclusive "miyoo" thing, so i dont think adding "miyoo" to its name is necessary... i would rename it to "control" (the repo)
I don't know, you're probably right... Let me think about it a bit.
After thinking about it a bit more, lets stick with "miyooctl" for now. We can drop the "2", though. I think adding "miyoo" to the name helps clarify that it is an exclusive miyoo thing. Also "control" is both very generic, and the name of a game, so I don't like it on two counts.
In the same vein, I'm a little iffy on the name "daemon"...
with a reusable workflow to build it!