Check spelling and grammar through out. Start with the leading sentence:
The global artificial intelligence (AI) market is expanding rapidly and demanding for robust quality assurance for machine learning (ML) systems to prevent risks such as misinformation, social bias, financial losses, and safety hazards. should read: The global artificial intelligence (AI) market is expanding rapidly, with demand for robust quality assurance for ML systems, to prevent risks such as misinformation, social bias, financial losses, and safety hazards.
With the revisions watch your sentence/paragraph length. There are lots of paragraphs that are one or two sentences long. For example, the paragraphs of the "problem statement" should really be one paragraph.
For multi-citation use [@openja2023studying;@alexander2023evaluating]
The Manual Evaluation section has a good example of the "unclear antecedant", where you begin by talking about "Manual evaluation", but then start just referring to evaluation as "it". In general, I prefer seeing the term being used explicitly, so the third sentence would be However, _manual evaluation_ is time-consuming . . .. This way, if people reading have lost concentration, they know what "it" refers to. Fixing unclear antecedants is just generally good practice. You know what you're talking about when you write, but the reader doesn't always know what you were thinking.
You can save words by clearing out adjectives and adverbs where not needed. For example, the first sentence of Success Metrics could just start: To assess the performance . . .. Be short and precise in your wording.
There are tense and pluralization mismatches in places throughout, for example: The design of our package follows object-oriented and SOLID principles, which is fully modular. Here when you say "which is fully modular", I assume you are talking about SOLID principles, which is plural. It should read ... which are ....
For the five System Design components, "FixML" and "It" are both a single word. Use "FixML", be precise.
The results section really looks good, you've done a lot of work here.
Conclusions look good too. I might drop the Wrap Up section header (but keep the paragraph). The term "Wrap Up" feels a little "informal" in the context of the report.
The global artificial intelligence (AI) market is expanding rapidly and demanding for robust quality assurance for machine learning (ML) systems to prevent risks such as misinformation, social bias, financial losses, and safety hazards.
should read:The global artificial intelligence (AI) market is expanding rapidly, with demand for robust quality assurance for ML systems, to prevent risks such as misinformation, social bias, financial losses, and safety hazards.
[@openja2023studying;@alexander2023evaluating]
However, _manual evaluation_ is time-consuming . . .
. This way, if people reading have lost concentration, they know what "it" refers to. Fixing unclear antecedants is just generally good practice. You know what you're talking about when you write, but the reader doesn't always know what you were thinking.To assess the performance . . .
. Be short and precise in your wording.The design of our package follows object-oriented and SOLID principles, which is fully modular
. Here when you say "which is fully modular", I assume you are talking about SOLID principles, which is plural. It should read... which are ...
.Wrap Up
section header (but keep the paragraph). The term "Wrap Up" feels a little "informal" in the context of the report.