field burning activity mapping - NAICS resolution should be higher - 5 or 6?

[WesIngwersen]

https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_StateGHGI.csv?plain=1#L14C1-L14C1

Activity	SectorSourceName	Sector
Agriculture - Field Burning of Agricultural Residues - Barley	NAICS_2012_Code	1111
Agriculture - Field Burning of Agricultural Residues - Chickpeas	NAICS_2012_Code	1111
Agriculture - Field Burning of Agricultural Residues - Cotton	NAICS_2012_Code	1119
Agriculture - Field Burning of Agricultural Residues - Dry Beans	NAICS_2012_Code	1111
Agriculture - Field Burning of Agricultural Residues - Grass Hay	NAICS_2012_Code	1119
Agriculture - Field Burning of Agricultural Residues - Legume Hay	NAICS_2012_Code	1119

[WesIngwersen]

Barley is 111199

Cotton is 11192

etc

@bl-young was 4 digit NAICS intentional?

[bl-young]

The state models only go to 3 or 4 digit NAICS so I assume that's why we did it that way. We can make them more explicit and it shouldn't impact the final FBS (though in the future could help if we go more granular)

[WesIngwersen]

It would be inconsistent for one with the national method or general principles not too so I'm making those changes now. working from refac-recursive bit I will post to a branch off their for review

[WesIngwersen]

This issue applies to animal ag as well ...

https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_StateGHGI.csv?plain=1#L6

animal ag mapping should be checked against the CoA_Livestock mapping

https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/recursive-refac/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_USDA_CoA_Livestock.csv

[WesIngwersen]

@bl-young punting this one to ERG to take over. Please use EPA_GHGI mapping for reference mapping checks.

[bl-young]

collectively these result in no changes in FBS