Closed xinyuejohn closed 5 months ago
Hi, I'm not sure I get what the issue is, does it apply to other variables than Glasgow Coma Scores ?
Regarding Glasgow Coma Scores, they are numerical scores; values in the OMOP tables should be the same as values from the original datasets.
These scores usually are int values but in some cases there are float values.
Here are the value_counts
of the first chunk of measurements for the Glasgow coma score total
(concept id 3007194)
value_as_number
14.000000 12412
3.000000 6025
4.000000 5525
6.000000 5250
13.000000 4876
15.000000 4575
5.000000 3958
10.000000 3557
9.000000 3465
7.000000 1826
12.000000 1747
8.000000 1606
11.000000 1242
14.333333 6
13.666667 2
8.500000 2
14.600000 1
3.583333 1
12.666667 1
12.500000 1
13.933333 1
14.500000 1
8.666667 1
14.200000 1
8.333333 1
10.466666 1
9.166667 1
6.933333 1
7.500000 1
4.600000 1
Name: count, dtype: int64
Does it look ok for you ?
Upon verifying the data, I noticed that the subscores (eye, verbal, motor) were missing from some of the measurement chunk files, this will be fixed in the next patch.
Thanks for your prompt reply! This is exactly what I'm asking for.
I've noticed that in the final OMOP tables, some measurements are represented using numerical labels. This includes various Glasgow Coma Scale assessments (total, eye opening, verbal, etc.) which are no longer in literal label form. However, I'm unable to locate the corresponding conversion information or understand what each numerical value represents.
Per the OMOP CDM guidelines, the original verbatim values from the source table should be preserved in the
measurement_source_value
column of the measurement table. Could you please verify this?Thank you!