Co-relative relative Clauses in Saraiki

meesumalam commented 9 months ago

Hi all,

I am annotating Saraiki under UD annotation scheme, I am stuck at making decision on following corelative relative clause in Saraiki. Translation is "I saw the farmer who slept in the house" lit translation " Which farmer was sleeping in the house he I saw".

       جیڑا            زمیندار    گھر         ستا    پیا      ہا     میں           اوں   کوں   ڈٹھا
                                                                        VERB   ACC PRON       PRON AUX AUX VERB     NOUN  NOUN-          ADJ
                                                                      see-PST ACC 3SG-Distal 1SG AUX AUX sleep-PST Home Farmer-M-SG REL-M-SG

Thanks

dan-zeman commented 9 months ago

meesumalam commented 9 months ago

Thanks, I think jeda and farmer will go with "amod" relation as it is functioning as relative adjective. Thoughts ?

dan-zeman commented 9 months ago

Thanks, I think jeda and farmer will go with "amod" relation as it is functioning as relative adjective. Thoughts ?

For me the main difference between ADJ and DET is the PronType feature. Since it is relative, I would give it PronType=Rel and then tag it DET rather than ADJ. Consequently the relation would also be det and not amod.

meesumalam commented 9 months ago

Thank you so much.

Meesum

From: Dan Zeman @.> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 2:04 AM To: UniversalDependencies/docs @.> Cc: Alam, Meesum @.>; Author @.> Subject: [External] Re: [UniversalDependencies/docs] Co-relative relative Clauses in Saraiki (Issue #1014)

You don't often get email from @.*** Learn why this is importanthttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification

This message was sent from a non-IU address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources.

Thanks, I think jeda and farmer will go with "amod" relation as it is functioning as relative adjective. Thoughts ?

For me the main difference between ADJ and DET is the PronType feature. Since it is relative, I would give it PronType=Rel and then tag it DET rather than ADJ. Consequently the relation would also be det and not amod.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/UniversalDependencies/docs/issues/1014#issuecomment-1968355695, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2XNAY4WDJBD6D4VOEW47RTYV3JH3AVCNFSM6AAAAABD432UNSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRYGM2TKNRZGU. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

UniversalDependencies / docs

Co-relative relative Clauses in Saraiki #1014