mainly to prevent name-squatting, but we never did anything with it, even not mirrors.
My own opinion on this is that I have nothing against mirrors (I would even not oppose a migration to GitLab — but not today as and we have others priority).
It looks like Derek setting up the mirrors for us would not really consumes our time (once we all answered the present thread and one of us have sent him some invitations).
What do you think about it?
Note that for UnvanquishedAssets, we may wand to do another scheme. As far as I know, GitLab allows to create groups of repositories in an organization, so maybe we can have https://gitlab.com/Unvanquished/UnvanquishedAssets/map-chasm_src.dpkdir. But before we think about the scheme for assets, Derek can already mirror Unvanquished and DaemonEngine repositories.
I see no reasons either for or against such a mirror. A mirror in the opposite direction would make sense such that we could remain visible on the larger platform. This direction does …?
@Viech, @DolceTriade do you have anything against setting up repository mirrors on GitLab?
I have no time for this but @pretuer (Derek Owmui,
derek1
on IRC) proposes himself to do it.At the time Microsoft bought GitHub I registered:
mainly to prevent name-squatting, but we never did anything with it, even not mirrors.
My own opinion on this is that I have nothing against mirrors (I would even not oppose a migration to GitLab — but not today as and we have others priority).
It looks like Derek setting up the mirrors for us would not really consumes our time (once we all answered the present thread and one of us have sent him some invitations).
What do you think about it?
Note that for
UnvanquishedAssets
, we may wand to do another scheme. As far as I know, GitLab allows to create groups of repositories in an organization, so maybe we can havehttps://gitlab.com/Unvanquished/UnvanquishedAssets/map-chasm_src.dpkdir
. But before we think about the scheme for assets, Derek can already mirrorUnvanquished
andDaemonEngine
repositories.