VSCodium / vscodium

binary releases of VS Code without MS branding/telemetry/licensing
https://vscodium.com
MIT License
24.81k stars 1.06k forks source link

CUPS dependency that is not present in VSCode #1680

Open Frostbyte4664 opened 11 months ago

Frostbyte4664 commented 11 months ago

Describe the bug VSCode does not require CUPS to run, but VSCodium does.

Please confirm that this problem is VSCodium-specific

Please confirm that the issue/resolution isn't already documented

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Build VSCodium Apparently the ebuild just unpacks a release...?
  2. Attempt to run VSCodium without CUPS installed
  3. /opt/vscodium/bin/../codium: error while loading shared libraries: libcups.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Expected behavior VSCodium running with the same dependencies as VSCode.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale. If this issue is still affecting you, please leave any comment, and we'll keep it open. If you have any new additional information, please include it with your comment!

arthurzam commented 5 months ago

This is still relevant, and just closing it won't fix the issue.

Stale bots never help fix issues, they just increase the rug. https://nostalebots.xyz/

daiyam commented 5 months ago

stale != closed

daiyam commented 5 months ago

The issue is most likely due to gentoo packaging. Feel free to make any PR if needed 😉

daiyam commented 5 months ago

This is still relevant, and just closing it won't fix the issue.

Stale bots never help fix issues, they just increase the rug. https://nostalebots.xyz/

I most agree to the argument and I hate those that close and lock an issue after a month of inactivity.

So I've implemented loose rules:

I found myself re-evaluating an issue after the stale notification.

daiyam commented 4 months ago

@arthurzam Have you opened an issue on Gentoo/Portage? It might be an issue due to the repackaging?