Closed Ircama closed 2 years ago
can we only symlink busybox's applets that not already linked to toybox,bzip,etc?
Are you referring to this? Could you better elaborate your request?
Haa, yes! I'm sorry, not a coder, don't know how to use github.
I purpose this
for i in `./busybox --list`; do sudo ln -sf busybox "$i"; done
for i in `ls /mnt/system/system/bin`; do rm /mnt/system/system/xbin/"$i"; done
Since busybox file won't move anywhere, do symlink instead of hardlink, for efficiency (is it work? I don't know) Delete applets that already installed in /system/bin, to avoid conflict (what conflict? again, I don't know)
I think we don't have to do this. I check with printenv
system/xbin is already there even tho there is no xbin in original build.
please tell me your opinion
Appropriate usage of PATH not only allows defining the precedence (PATH elements are checked left to right), but also it manually enables the definition of the additional busybox, so that it is disabled by default. Anyway busybox is just a trivial example, we can remove it and simply replace it with three ellipsis indicating any program to add.
Oh I'm sorry. I'm not aware pull request to readme file, not the apply file. My apologies.
can we only symlink busybox's applets that not already linked to toybox,bzip,etc?