Open WeiHanWong opened 2 weeks ago
[IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]
Thank you so much for taking the time to report this issue and for your detailed investigation. Upon reviewing the relevant section of the User Guide, it appears that the stated functionality aligns with the current behaviour.
Specifically, the UG mentions (also seen in the screenshot of the original issue): Mandatory field: <INDEX>, at least one of the Optional Fields
, indicating that while the index is required, at least one additional field must also be provided.
Based on this, the system seems to be functioning as intended according to the documented guidelines. However, we truly appreciate your effort in highlighting this, and if there’s any additional context or clarification you’d like to provide, we’d be more than happy to revisit the matter.
Thank you again for your feedback!
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
Explanation: Since the 6.2.2 of the user guide states that all the field are optional, I could technically do
edit 1
without errorReplication Step:
command entered:
edit 1
expected output:Edited Client: <CLIENT DETAILS>
resultant output: