Open StevenDufresne opened 2 weeks ago
What do you think these should link to?
Rather than making each a link (which would be a lot of underlined text), I'm inclined to add a "learn more" style link or button linking to https://make.wordpress.org/
. Something like this, which would work for the companies with few teams, too:
But maybe with better text than "View all team opportunities" :)
Agree with @ryelle, I think a single link to Make would keep the layout clean while being appealing. What the label for this could be @thetinyl?
What the label for this could be @thetinyl?
Gooooood question. So I can see a world where we could be very simple and clear and to-the-point with something like: See all contributor teams
Or we can frame it a little differently like: Learn more about contributor teams
I like "Learn more…", which works since make.w.org has little blurbs about each, and links to the contributor quiz.
I like "Learn more…"
Yeah, that's my preference, too. I'm comfortable going with that. We can always adjust if someone feels differently.
I also like the "Learn more…" version. Let's go with that 🚀
What do you think these should link to?
I don't think we have an interesting place to link them to yet, however, I would expect them to link to their equivalent make blog which includes information about the team in the Welcome box (which won't be collapsed for new users). So for core: https://make.wordpress.org/core.
Regarding adding a link below the teams... I think that is a logical and neat solution and I'm ok with that. I still think we should linking the teams directly everywhere they are referenced. I beleive the team names are clear enough that a user's initial instinct of whether that team makes sense for them is likely correct and they should enter the contributor funnel immediately. I wouldn't want to impede users ability to get started because it would visually be unappealing. I would prefer we rethink the layout/design if that's the case.
Header | Header |
---|---|
I don't feel it's too distracting. Can we try it as an experiment? If no one clicks a team link within 2 weeks, we can revert?
I beleive the team names are clear enough that a user's initial instinct of whether that team makes sense for them is likely correct and they should enter the contributor funnel immediately. I wouldn't want to impede users ability to get started because it would visually be unappealing. I would prefer we rethink the layout/design if that's the case.
Good point. Regarding a new design, I proposed one in #321 that taps into your suggestion.
Can we try it as an experiment? If no one clicks a team link within 2 weeks, we can revert?
+1 to this. We can try it and see how it works.
Does every team have a unique p2? I'm not sure. I still think landing on the Make homepage and getting more details on each team/seeing the contributor quiz would be a better experience than dropping people right onto a P2, even with the welcome box.
Can we try it as an experiment? If no one clicks a team link within 2 weeks, we can revert?
How can we get this data to know whether this works? Would we also test out a single "learn more" button to compare?
I'm not sure. I still think landing on the Make homepage and getting more details on each team/seeing the contributor quiz would be a better experience than dropping people right onto a P2, even with the welcome box.
Not a strong opinion, but I do agree with @ryelle. Most pledge pages won't have all/most of teams listed either, so why not lead a prospective pledge to the full list (i.e. Make homepage) that has every team's mini description.
Not a strong opinion, but I do agree with @ryelle. Most pledge pages won't have all/most of teams listed either, so why not lead a prospective pledge to the full list (i.e. Make homepage) that has every team's mini description.
Okay. Let's go with a link then. 👍
We show the teams in the sidebar for each pledge. As a prospective pledge, I would be interested in viewing that team. Can we link those so they bring you to the team description on make?
Screenshot
Replace with links.