search

XuezheMax / NeuroNLP2

Deep neural models for core NLP tasks (Pytorch version)
GNU General Public License v3.0
441 stars 89 forks source link

Please clarify stanford conversion tool number #19

Closed ianupright closed 6 years ago

ianupright commented 6 years ago

Hi,

For the results in the paper, "Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing", which version of the Stanford dependency converter was used to convert PTB 3.0? Was the same version used in all experiments including BIAF: re-impl ?

Thanks, Ian

XuezheMax commented 6 years ago

Hi, The version of Stanford converter used to convert PTB in all experiments is v3.3.0.

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:04 PM Ian Upright notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi,

For the results in the paper, "Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing", which version of the Stanford dependency converter was used to convert PTB 3.0? Was the same version used in all experiments including BIAF: re-impl ?

Thanks, Ian

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/XuezheMax/NeuroNLP2/issues/19, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUtlp7Jk8_GbDsIrQFsmbbqAC6RKJGOks5uL1jDgaJpZM4Vm_dl .

--

Best regards, Ma，Xuezhe Language Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Tel: +1 206-512-5977

wangxinyu0922 commented 5 years ago

Hi, The version of Stanford converter used to convert PTB in all experiments is v3.3.0. … On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:04 PM Ian Upright @.***> wrote: Hi, For the results in the paper, "Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing", which version of the Stanford dependency converter was used to convert PTB 3.0? Was the same version used in all experiments including BIAF: re-impl ? Thanks, Ian — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19>, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUtlp7Jk8_GbDsIrQFsmbbqAC6RKJGOks5uL1jDgaJpZM4Vm_dl . -- ------------------ Best regards, Ma，Xuezhe Language Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Tel: +1 206-512-5977

Hi, what's the tool for converting CTB 5.1? Stanford converter v3.3.0 or Penn2Malt?

XuezheMax commented 5 years ago

It is Penn2Malt

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:53 AM Xinyu Wang notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi, The version of Stanford converter used to convert PTB in all experiments is v3.3.0. … <#m9180899659228363792> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:04 PM Ian Upright @.***> wrote: Hi, For the results in the paper, "Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing", which version of the Stanford dependency converter was used to convert PTB 3.0? Was the same version used in all experiments including BIAF: re-impl ? Thanks, Ian — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19 https://github.com/XuezheMax/NeuroNLP2/issues/19>, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUtlp7Jk8_GbDsIrQFsmbbqAC6RKJGOks5uL1jDgaJpZM4Vm_dl . -- ------------------ Best regards, Ma，Xuezhe Language Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Tel: +1 206-512-5977

Hi, what's the tool for converting CTB 5.1? Stanford converter v3.3.0 or Penn2Matt?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/XuezheMax/NeuroNLP2/issues/19?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA2S3FWYFZ2EZESXBLVL3JTQNQN3TA5CNFSM4FM365S2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEAS4EOQ#issuecomment-539345466, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2S3FRFQOV7QEWB2S4PQULQNQN3TANCNFSM4FM365SQ .

wangxinyu0922 commented 5 years ago

It is Penn2Malt … On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:53 AM Xinyu Wang @.> wrote: Hi, The version of Stanford converter used to convert PTB in all experiments is v3.3.0. … <#m9180899659228363792> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:04 PM Ian Upright @.> wrote: Hi, For the results in the paper, "Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing", which version of the Stanford dependency converter was used to convert PTB 3.0? Was the same version used in all experiments including BIAF: re-impl ? Thanks, Ian — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19 <#19>>, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUtlp7Jk8_GbDsIrQFsmbbqAC6RKJGOks5uL1jDgaJpZM4Vm_dl . -- ------------------ Best regards, Ma，Xuezhe Language Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Tel: +1 206-512-5977 Hi, what's the tool for converting CTB 5.1? Stanford converter v3.3.0 or Penn2Matt? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA2S3FWYFZ2EZESXBLVL3JTQNQN3TA5CNFSM4FM365S2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEAS4EOQ#issuecomment-539345466>, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2S3FRFQOV7QEWB2S4PQULQNQN3TANCNFSM4FM365SQ .

Thank you for your reply, could you tell me which ctb rule did you use? The rule in penn2malt or the rule in Zhang and Clark (2008)