Open siegelna opened 1 month ago
Thank you for your thorough comment. You are correct that I apply a further log-transformation after DESeq normalization. However, this step is solely for obtaining the normalized count matrix for gene-level visualization. The actual differential testing directly uses data normalized within DESeq. I hope this clears it up.
Yes, it does. Thank you for the clarification.
It appears the counts were normalized twice for this analysis.
https://github.com/ZainulArifin1/Jurkat_Transcriptomics_Analysis/blame/c5acc079ec9b6c3023b12637fc0f0c57ac1fd20d/Peter_Jurkat_Figures_SVG.rmd#L146-L159
I used
EdgeR
instead ofDEseq2
but a glance at the normalized count matrices shows stark differences. I imagine a similar result would be observed withDEseq2
.