jodydonetti
commented
6 months ago Hi @celluj34 sorry for the delay in answering, but I've been quite busy working on the v1.0 that will be released in a matter of weeks (I released the preview1 last week, please take a look if you can!) and preparing for some shows.
Anyway: last week with the preview1 release of the v1.0 I declared a feature freeze, but you asked for this in December and after analyzing it I've found that, on top of adding a new option in the FusionCacheOptions type, it would've been a matter of just 1 extra check on 2 lines total.
And so here it is, the very last feature before going full v1.0.
Please let me know what you think, hope this helps.
celluj34
Problem
I have a specific use-case where my data API reads and writes to the cache, and a separate events API that only writes to the cache (to be specific, it only removes entries from the cache). I would like to improve performance by having my events API ignore backplane notifications. I still want them sent from the events API, but never received.
We are using redis as the distributed cache and backplane system.
Solution
Perhaps some other option in the DI setup,
ReceiveBackplaneNotifications.Alternatives
The only alternative we have now is to have the events API maintain a 'normal' cache instance.
Additional context
n/a