Open DrZoltanFazekas opened 1 month ago
Why? Not against doing this, just curious.
My first thought was because it makes it harder to check the correctness of the faucet balance (e.g. I can't calculate how many times it was used based on its balance just as a hypothetical example) and the correctness or the rewards earned by the validator, if they are not sent to a separate account.
On a second thought, I'd start using the null address as reward address for the bootstrap because that is exactly what we will need for the guard nodes we will run with a deposit borrowed from the null address on mainnet i.e. they should not earn rewards.
In the current ZQ2 test networks, the bootstrap is a validator and it uses the faucet address as reward address. We should change it to use a "neutral" address like all other validators do.