search

aaronpeikert / repro-tutorial

https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3040053
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
9 stars 4 forks source link

explain how this workflow is suitable for multi site studies #234

Closed aaronpeikert closed 3 years ago

cjvanlissa commented 3 years ago

Maybe mention the possibility of running docker on a server, or dockerhub here? Those seem useful for multi-site studies

brandmaier commented 3 years ago

Yes, I think direct and indirect code re-use is a big bonus. This applies to making both analyses as well as presentation of results (ie, graphs) more streamlined across sites.

aaronpeikert commented 3 years ago

I was really surprised that two reviewers anticipated problems in multisite studies. I actually was convinced that this reproducibility standard and PAC were uniquely suited for multi-site research projects. My line of reasoning was that the high standardisation and possible reuse are advantages that are pronounced in those settings. I have to think about this a while longer.

brandmaier commented 3 years ago

At this point in time, the utility for multi-site studies is simply a claim. We have developed this workflow as a general workflow for collaborative projects, so I expect them to work well also for multi-site studies. I think we should argue that we expect them to work well in multi-site studies but that the workflow has yet to stand the test of time.