Closed hongyi-zhao closed 1 year ago
It looks like that as of now e.g. 2023-03-01, the gpt-3.5-turbo model doesn't support conversation, which is the most fascinating and powerful feature of chatgpt. And most of the classical chatgpt prompts are not working well on the gpt-3.5-turbo (so called the latest one). I'm upset about this release.
You can now use POST https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions
to create a chat completion
Duplicate of
It looks like that as of now e.g. 2023-03-01, the gpt-3.5-turbo model doesn't support conversation, which is the most fascinating and powerful feature of chatgpt. And most of the classical chatgpt prompts are not working well on the gpt-3.5-turbo (so called the latest one). I'm upset about this release.
It does.
@acheong08 what about tokens?
Error: 400 Bad Request {
"error": {
"message": "This model's maximum context length is 4096 tokens. However, your messages resulted in 4144 tokens. Please reduce the length of the messages.",
"type": "invalid_request_error",
"param": "messages",
"code": "context_length_exceeded"
}
}
Need to fix
It looks like that as of now e.g. 2023-03-01, the gpt-3.5-turbo model doesn't support conversation, which is the most fascinating and powerful feature of chatgpt. And most of the classical chatgpt prompts are not working well on the gpt-3.5-turbo (so called the latest one). I'm upset about this release.
It does.
It does, but not explicitly does. You need tricks to support that.
https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/975#issuecomment-1451270606 It does, but not explicitly does. You need tricks to support that.
I want to know whether it is possible to achieve this goal from the perspective of this project?
#975 (comment) It does, but not explicitly does. You need tricks to support that.
I want to know whether it is possible to achieve this goal from the perspective of this project?
I already did it
I already did it
It seems that you mean the following one described in README:
BTW, to use this API interface, must I regenerate a separate <api_key>
? If so, where is the web URL to do so?
BTW, to use this API interface, must I regenerate a separate
? If so, where is the web URL to do so?
Yes, did you mean something else?
Not really. Just wanted to make sure we understand each other correctly. Because this new technology is easy to misunderstand each other on some communication details and lead to a waste of time.
I tried with my API key, the results show that this method has a much faster speed. Does it mean more expensive use costs?
However, this method does not support the use of arrow keys to move the cursor, as shown below:
Another question on gpt-3.5-turbo model
, see my inquiry and ChatGPT's answer:
(datasci) werner@X10DAi:~$ python3 -m revChatGPT.V3 --api_key <api_key>
ChatGPT - Official ChatGPT API
Repo: github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT
Type '!help' to show a full list of commands
Press enter twice to submit your question.
User:
Do you use the gpt-3.5-turbo model?
ChatGPT:
As an AI language model, I don't have access to specific information about the models used to train me or any other AI language model. However, I was trained using a variant of the GPT architecture, which is a very popular and effective approach for natural language processing tasks.
User:
(datasci) werner@X10DAi:~$ python3 -m revChatGPT.V1
ChatGPT - A command-line interface to OpenAI's ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/chat)
Repo: github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT
Type '!help' to show a full list of commands
Press Esc followed by Enter or Alt+Enter to send a message.
Logging in...
You:
Do you use the gpt-3.5-turbo model?
Chatbot:
As an AI language model, I am not capable of using any specific model, including the "gpt-3.5-turbo" model that you mentioned. However, I am trained on a large dataset that includes a wide range of language models, including but not limited to GPT-3, which enables me to understand and generate human-like responses to a wide range of questions and topics.
You:
Why would it give such an explanation?
dunno
I tried with my API key, the results show that this method has a much faster speed. Does it mean more expensive use costs?
$0.002 per 1k tokens. Reference: https://platform.openai.com/pricing. It's cheaper than GPT-3
However, this method does not support the use of arrow keys to move the cursor, as shown below:
I'll fix that
Is there an existing issue for this?
What would your feature do ?
Today, I received the following notification from OpenAI:
So, I issued this FR.
Best, Zhao
Proposed workflow
Additional information
No response