Closed kellymarchisio closed 1 year ago
@mjpost @davidstap I'm wondering if more papers potentially have the same issue. Any input?
We spot-checked a lot of video/paper matches. Not sure what went wrong here. I’ll fix this and will investigate.
Hi there - any update on this one?
Hi, I’ll fix this on Sunday.
I did some more checks for EMNLP 2021 (Findings) videos, and did not find any additional mismatches. @kellymarchisio can you share a link to the video if you still have it? If not I'll contact Underline.
I'm not sure what happened exactly. If I run my video ingestion script, the correct match is made. There were some issues with earlier versions of this script, but it seems solved for now.
I actually cannot find it, so it would be great if you could contact Underline
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 4:51 AM David Stap @.***> wrote:
I did some more checks for EMNLP 2021 (Findings) videos, and did not find any additional mismatches. @kellymarchisio https://github.com/kellymarchisio can you share a link to the video if you still have it? If not I'll contact Underline.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/acl-org/acl-anthology/issues/2264#issuecomment-1374781417, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3SB2HSDQDRLKE3UZI27C3WRKEZXANCNFSM6AAAAAASOY3QRQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
I received the video and matched it to your paper. Thanks for the heads-up!
Excellent, thank you, David!
The video linked to this paper is not the correct one. https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-emnlp.64.mp4 appears to actually be paper 2021.findings-emnlp.210.