Open eugene-babichenko opened 3 years ago
closes #163
I could just remove that line, but I think this will break clients that rely on the existing behavior and would need a major release.
Any outstanding changes required on this PR that I can help with? Running into the same issue :)
Not really, this branch is usable as it is.
closes #163
I could just remove that line, but I think this will break clients that rely on the existing behavior and would need a major release.