Open Westbrook opened 3 years ago
Interesting. Do we just expect the label to never wrap, or do we want to balance the flex-grow
between the label and the bar to make it reasonable at all times?
In the case that we allow wrapping, we'll also need to decide what to do with the percentage on the other end of the bar. Should it be "top aligned", which makes it look weird next to the bar, or do we made the "middle aligned" which means that it won't align exactly with the label in any way. I'm not sure I have a specific desire as much as I want to be able to say. "this is this way because xyz (with link)."
Interesting. We'll need to ask designers what the intent is here and respond accordingly.
@badimon says:
I assume that a side label would wrap the same way with all elements center aligned vertically – good question.
@NateBaldwinDesign says:
Hmm… for this one I would think that it’s got some constraints to avoid wrapping whenever possible :thinking_face: . Like in this example, the meter itself should shrink in order to accommodate or the text. But at the end of the day, wrapping should be there for edge cases. And for that I’d recommend we align the text vertically center so that the label on the right doesn’t look so misplaced when the left label is wrapped.
Looks like we have some work to do here.
Description
Multi-word labelling for
ProgressBar
andMeter
cause the vertical alignment to be weird. Should expanded layout support be added, or should we prevent line breaks, or?Steps to reproduce
document.querySelector("body > div.spectrum-Site > div.spectrum-Site-content > div.spectrum-Site-mainContent > div.spectrum-Site-mainContainer > article > article:nth-child(13) > section > div.spectrum-CSSExample-example > div > div.spectrum-FieldLabel.spectrum-FieldLabel--sizeM.spectrum-ProgressBar-label")
Expected behavior
It's nice, no matter the content.
Screenshots
Environment
Additional context
Side label isn't really marketed for
Meter
should that not be available in that context?