So, been thinking a lot about ags4, and wanting to document it, I guess I could start already with branches in the repo that is in the wiki (I have a mirror here).
But since it seems GitHub never added new features to the wiki (like branching in the wiki itself would be nice), it seems it would be more useful to move to a regular repository. Or should we instead create two directories, ags3 and ags4, and maintain the two directories in this repository? Or should we have an ags4-manual repository?
Basically, just wanted to see the general feelings regarding where to go. Overall there is a lot to document already and I would like to start separating the tasks and working on them because it's a lot of things...
NOTE: on using two directories, the sdlwiki is a complex thing, but it does store sdl2 and sdl3 as separate directories (here), this is where I picked the idea.
So, been thinking a lot about ags4, and wanting to document it, I guess I could start already with branches in the repo that is in the wiki (I have a mirror here).
But since it seems GitHub never added new features to the wiki (like branching in the wiki itself would be nice), it seems it would be more useful to move to a regular repository. Or should we instead create two directories, ags3 and ags4, and maintain the two directories in this repository? Or should we have an
ags4-manualrepository?Basically, just wanted to see the general feelings regarding where to go. Overall there is a lot to document already and I would like to start separating the tasks and working on them because it's a lot of things...
NOTE: on using two directories, the sdlwiki is a complex thing, but it does store sdl2 and sdl3 as separate directories (here), this is where I picked the idea.