Closed Cryptobuzz1 closed 2 years ago
I second this. We need some rules and structure. 30days is more than enough to react.
30 days is too much, we need to be able to react quicker. I suggest 15 days.
Yes we aim to get proposals voted on within this timeframe. It's more the advice given to proposals to be accepted by the PM's and the proposer does not ammend.
Thank you for your comments. After taking this point into consideration we believe you have a valid point therefor we agree this should be a 15day window.
I have changed the header to 15 days and the PM's have APPROVED this proposal will got to que to vote shortly
Proposal opened on snapshot platform.:- https://snapshot.org/#/aggregatedfinance.eth/proposal/0x644c2ba297ec25a56265720905df7b214b3309568da1883a01b6ec447b9212e9
Proposal Passed. This boundary/ruling is enforced starting 09/09/22
Proposal made on behalf of the proposal Managers.
To introduce a 15day window on all proposals submitted.
We feel 15days is long enough to adjust or ammend a proposal to meet all criteria to be APPROVED by the PMs of aggregatedfinance.
Pros-
To create boundaries on all new proposals to be acted upon if they fail to meet criteria for vote.
Enables the project to keep the proposal list in adequate order and prevents a back log of proposals been open on github (clean and tidy approach)
Cons:-
Any new proposer or proposal will have a 15 day window to act upon the obsticals arisen from community or pms. And therefore has a timed window to interact and change the proposal accordingly.