Closed mstimberg closed 1 month ago
Thank you very much for the suggestions and I agree the 113 MB reference is not clear. I will add that to the joss
branch rather than messing about multiple remotes to add it to this PR :) once I reference this PR will merge for convenience.
Sounds/looks good to me :+1:
Some minor suggestions for changes to the JOSS paper in the context of openjournals/joss-reviews#6925
Please merge them in case you agree with them (no need to do a new release/archive, since only the paper is affected).
In addition, could you please consider making the following sentences more clear:
If I am not mistaken, the 113 MB RAM figure is for the 500 000 row dataset with 10000 set intersections, which in my opinion is not clear from the formulation "for that dataset".