Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I strongly feel that the right model here is to have Lua bindings be separate.
pugixml has relatively large API surface area and strict portability
requirements; Lua bindings do not only depend on Lua, but bring in another
dependency - LuaBridge.
All of this means that it's hard for me to maintain these bindings; also, most
users of pugixml do not care about Lua or Lua bindings.
Original comment by arseny.k...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2014 at 5:29
I agree with you now. I've restructured the project some while ago, which
reflects the same design decision: the bindings are a separate library that
depends on pugixml.
Original comment by d.ledent...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2014 at 6:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
d.ledent...@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2012 at 9:39