ampproject / meta-ac

The AMP Advisory Committee
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
24 stars 17 forks source link

AMP & Search #166

Open jorydotcom opened 3 years ago

jorydotcom commented 3 years ago

Potential Topic Areas

tobie commented 3 years ago
adactio commented 3 years ago

Just to share my thoughts on why this is a bit of an existential question about what AMP is...

There's always been a bit of a duality to AMP:

In the past, the use-case for having a separate AMP page (i.e. using the AMP format and validating against it) was pretty clear: it was the only way of appearing in the top stories carousel in Google search. Now that this privilege is being removed (any sufficiently performant page will be eligible for inclusion from May), it raises the question of whether there is any incentive for publishers to use AMP the format.

Note this is different from asking whether there's any incentive for developers to use AMP at all, as long as the word "AMP" is being used to refer to the collection of web components.

The confusion between these two definitions of AMP is rife throughout the project. The repo for amphtml, which bills itself as "The AMP web component framework" is actually a repo for the AMP format: building pages with the AMP doctype and validating against a set of rules.