Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Also, I set my options such that the inaccuracies will not cause it to not
record,
they're set to:
split frequency: no splitting
min time between points: 10 min
min distance between points: 328 ft
max distance between points: 3.1 mi
min accuracy: 3.1 mi
signal sampling frequency: 5 min
Original comment by daar...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2010 at 4:49
I'm in favor of rejecting this feature request. We purposely did not allow
tracking
based on network location. We found the error to be too large to be useful.
Why would someone want this functionality instead of turning on the GPS?
If we did do this I think we should have a very load warning that the data is
likely
to be crap.
Original comment by sandordo...@google.com
on 24 May 2010 at 5:09
All the statistics would be useless in this mode, I think it's only useful for
very
long trips where you want rough estimates of where you went through. I'm also
not
favorable of having this feature unless there's a big warning when you enable
it.
Original comment by rdama...@google.com
on 24 May 2010 at 5:16
I would like very rough estimates of where my device is located at given times.
GPS
is not an option because of battery life.
It's a completely different use for this application than what was probably
initially intended, but letting the user have readily available options makes
it
useful to a larger target audience.
The warning is perfectly okay... on a sidenote, this application already
supports "3.1 miles" of inaccuracy. That's a whole lot more than the inaccuracy
circle I see when my GPS is off and the device is using towers for location. Is
the
circle not accurate when the GPS is off?
Original comment by daar...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2010 at 5:32
I would appreciate this too.
I have a Motorola Milestone. With GPS the battery lasts a bit more than 2
hours. With
just Wireless I can use it for two days. Tracking by GPS on a bike trip is
impossible
in the current state.
Original comment by felixjmo...@gmail.com
on 25 May 2010 at 8:07
I thought this over (as mentioned on the e-mail list) - it makes sense for some
applications like photo geotagging. Many applications, like Aperture, will load
a GPX file, then allow you to correct the points on top of google maps - I've
been using this with the GPS on, but obviously that's not battery-efficient.
We can always make it a specific checkbox on the preferences with a big warning
about the data being very bad.
Sandor, what do you think?
Original comment by rdama...@google.com
on 12 Aug 2010 at 12:59
SGTM. My only request that this pref defaults to false.
Original comment by sandordo...@google.com
on 12 Aug 2010 at 5:00
Celltowers GPS has 2 advantages:
It works inside buildings
It consumes far less battery than true gps
So, for people who do not need high accuracy, this is a good alternative.
a simple solution:
in preferences, two checkboxes:
- one for true gps
- one for cell tower gps
so, people can chose true gps And/Or celltowers gps
The AND is important for people who want the best available signal, if true gps
isn't available, then use celltowers gps
To avoid complaining people, set celltowers gps on disabled by default
Thanks !
Original comment by sjauquet
on 16 Aug 2010 at 7:40
this option will be very usefull for photographers who want to geotag their
pictures.
Original comment by sjauquet
on 16 Aug 2010 at 7:42
(just removing OpSys-Android label, all issues are in Android anyway)
Original comment by rdama...@google.com
on 26 Jul 2011 at 1:00
Original comment by jshih@google.com
on 21 Jun 2012 at 10:15
In the next version, 2.0.5, will be able to record from wifi location.
Original comment by jshih@google.com
on 10 Jun 2013 at 6:34
Is there a way to turn off wifi location in 2.0.5?
Original comment by eric3...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2013 at 7:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
daar...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2010 at 4:45