Closed style95 closed 8 months ago
Merging #5436 (5ffbafa) into master (951ce58) will increase coverage by
18.21%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.:exclamation: Current head 5ffbafa differs from pull request most recent head ed67fc9. Consider uploading reports for the commit ed67fc9 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5436 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 58.52% 76.73% +18.21%
===========================================
Files 241 241
Lines 14632 14632
Branches 616 616
===========================================
+ Hits 8563 11228 +2665
+ Misses 6069 3404 -2665
Files Changed | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...sk/core/containerpool/docker/DockerContainer.scala | 98.79% <ø> (+4.81%) |
:arrow_up: |
...enwhisk/core/containerpool/docker/RuncClient.scala | 100.00% <100.00%> (+16.66%) |
:arrow_up: |
... and 134 files with indirect coverage changes
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Since upgrading the docker version could impact many downstream, I think it would be better to separate the change to upgrade docker and the change to maximize the build space for multi-runtime tests.
It turns out that this change is not directly related to the failure of multi-runtime tests. So it's not that urgent now but it is still worth discussing.
LGTM this is very long overdue, are there any blockers to merging this. I believe this should only affect docker client right anyways?
I have been thinking of running a performance test with this version. And last time we upgraded the docker version, some downstream like IBM needed some time to prepare for taking the change in. I thought that a similar thing might happen.
This PR has opened for a while, I would merge this.
Description
The docker version of the GitHub action runner is 23.0.6. Instead of downgrading the engine version I want to give a shot to upgrade the client version.
Related issue and scope
My changes affect the following components
Types of changes
Checklist: