Open RyanM-Arista opened 1 year ago
@RyanM-Arista - thanks for submitting this issue.
So the recommendation would be to move the interface profile
configuration template after the interface
configuration template, in order to avoid this issue.
QQ: How is this a bug in AVD?
AVD supports this requirement today by moving the profile commands to eos_cli
, which is rendered last, does it not?
Not sure this is really a bug in AVD as such, but more an optimization we can implement. Downside is that the produced config will not follow the order of EOS "show run" which we try to (I know we are still far from that target). BTW how are EOS-driven interface profiles useful when using AVD?
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. The issue will be reviewed by a maintainer and may be closed
Issue Summary
On devices with large number of ports with interface profiles, i.e. CCS-720XP-96ZC2, validate and compare times out on occasion and CVP throws an error. With discussion from TAC it was advised to adjust the location of the interface profile configuration as per the CV-Tips below to speed up the parsing of configurations with interface profiles.
https://www.arista.com/ko/cg-cv/cv-tips-for-applying-profiles-to-the-interfaces
Running AVD 3.8.7
Which component(s) of AVD impacted
eos_cli_config_gen
How do you run AVD ?
Ansible CLI (with virtual-env or native python)
Steps to reproduce
Relevant log output
Contributing Guide