Inconsistency between ASKAP_SURVEYS db and data available on nimbus

[ddobie]

For epoch 14 the following field exists on nimbus but is not contained in racs_mid_info.csv although it does (now?) exist in the ASKAP_SURVEYS db.

RACS_0104+00

I'm not sure what's caused this, but it should be a straightforward fix.

For epoch 14 the following fields exist but there is a discrepancy between the SBID in the nimbus TILES filename and the SBID in racs_mid_info.csv and ASKAP_SURVEYS:

RACS_2359+00, RACS_0021+00, RACS_0042+00

The same issue applied to the following fields in epoch 0:

RACS_1122+00A, RACS_1237+00A, RACS_1739-25A, RACS_1806-25A, RACS_1057-06A, RACS_1212+00A, RACS_1302+00A, RACS_1326+00A, RACS_1416+00A, RACS_0102-06A, RACS_0216-06A, RACS_0306-06A, RACS_1753-18A, RACS_2004+00A, RACS_0943-06A, RACS_1752-31A, RACS_2004-06A, RACS_2028-06A, RACS_1008-06A, RACS_1033-06A, RACS_1122-06A, RACS_1212-06A, RACS_1237-06A, RACS_1351-06A, RACS_1416-06A, RACS_1441-06A, RACS_0320-43A, RACS_0341-50A, RACS_0501-43A, RACS_0534-43A, RACS_0304-50A, RACS_0310-56A, RACS_2007-56A, RACS_2049-56A, RACS_2055-50A, RACS_2256-56A

It looks like the files on nimbus have a larger SBID and so these are likely fields that have been re-observed. That poses a few questions:

• How many (if any) of the original observations are usable?
• Where can we get the observation information for the second observations