Closed larrybradley closed 10 years ago
IMO everything in photutils.utils is of more general use than photutils
and should either go in this imageutils
repo or in scikit-image
.
My personal preference would always be to put functions that are not specific to astronomy in any way into scikit-image
, but obviously there is not agreement on this. (We already have created astropy.convolution
, astropy.units
, astropy.modeling
and astropy.stats
which contain very little astronomy-specific functions instead of contributing to the scipy
ecosystem, which I find bizarre.)
On the other hand I don't have time to make pull requests for scikit-image
at the moment, so moving photutils.utils
into imageutils
now would be OK with me (let's wait for https://github.com/astropy/photutils/pull/123 to be merged first though).
I wanted to set @larrybradley as Assignee, but I can't.
@eteq or @astrofrog Could you please change the settings for this repo so that "astropy-contributors" can be assigned to imageutils
issues?
And please give @larrybradley merge privileges for this repo.
Done!
@astrofrog Thanks!
Sound good? Let me know and I can do that.
Actually, most of the tools in
photutils.utils
could go inimageutils
.