Closed edaphos closed 6 months ago
Your report is thin. Did you use off-line version 4 (if so, OS?) or the online version 5? What diagram, and what trace you processed / aimed to process? If you got some digitized data, what are the readings?
Opting for a manual pick (without KI support) of the solid blue squares (MOD/Expected) in the fourth plot (NE_GSZ), I obtained these readings:
49.451, 3.9666
359.56, 2.9817
1852.9, 2.0544
1674.2, 1.0180
I see a 0
on the x axis which is strange for log scale. Is the scale linear up to 10 and then log scale by any chance?
OK. Calibrating x-axis with X1 = 10 and X2 = 10000, and not using points, I digitized positions along the x-axis, for "0", 10, 100, 1000, 10000 to yield corresponding digitized values of 5.9, 9.9, 71.6, 841.7, 10000. Must be a "mixed" plot ???
Yes. Unfortunately, this chart (Fig 1) is rather odd. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub
Yeah, something is weird with the axis. Distance from 10-100 is not the same as 100-1000
After calibrating X-Axis for log scale (as described in protocol) the digitized values returned are incorrect. Please advise.