search

axjasf / PersonalFinanceCategorizer_WebApp

0 stars 0 forks source link

Code Review #28

Closed axjasf closed 2 hours ago

axjasf commented 2 hours ago

Thank you for providing the code for review. As a senior software developer, I'll provide a holistic review of the codebase, focusing on code quality, consistency, documentation, and overall structure. Here's my assessment:

```21:30:initialize_db.py
def init_db():
    # Extract the database file path from the URI
    db_path = DATABASE_URI.replace('sqlite:///', '')

    logger.info(f"Attempting to connect to database at: {db_path}")

    if not os.path.exists(os.path.dirname(db_path)):
        os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(db_path))
        logger.info(f"Created directory: {os.path.dirname(db_path)}")
 This block could benefit from error handling for file system operations.
import pytest
import pandas as pd
from services.import_service import read_csv, apply_field_mapping, validate_data, insert_transactions

def test_read_csv():
    # TODO: Implement test for read_csv function
    pass

def test_apply_field_mapping():
    # TODO: Implement test for apply_field_mapping function
    pass

def test_validate_data():
    # TODO: Implement test for validate_data function
    pass

def test_insert_transactions(mocker):
    # TODO: Implement test for insert_transactions function
    pass

In conclusion, the project has a good foundation but needs work in several areas, particularly in implementing tests, improving documentation, and ensuring consistency across the codebase. Prioritize completing the core functionality, implementing tests, and refining the project structure in the next sprint. Also, ensure that the README and other documentation accurately reflect the current state and goals of the project.

axjasf commented 2 hours ago

Project Structure: The project structure is generally good, with a clear separation of concerns. However, there are some inconsistencies and areas for improvement:

The personalfinance/ directory structure doesn't match the proposed structure in assets/structure.txt. This inconsistency could lead to confusion. There's no clear distinction between application code and tests. Consider moving all tests into a separate tests/ directory at the root level.

axjasf commented 2 hours ago

Project Structure: The project structure is generally good, with a clear separation of concerns. However, there are some inconsistencies and areas for improvement:

The personalfinance/ directory structure doesn't match the proposed structure in assets/structure.txt. This inconsistency could lead to confusion. There's no clear distinction between application code and tests. Consider moving all tests into a separate tests/ directory at the root level.

After reviewing the provided code snippets, I noticed that there are indeed tests located outside the /tests folder. Specifically, I found test-related code in the following file:

# How to use this script:
#
# This script performs a performance test on the database by generating and inserting
# a specified number of transactions and their associated splits.
#
# To run the script, use the following command in your terminal:
#
# python generate_performance_test_data.py [options]
#
# Available options:
# --transactions INT    Number of transactions to generate (default: 1000)
# --avg-splits FLOAT    Average number of splits per transaction (default: 2)
# --max-splits INT      Maximum number of splits per transaction (default: 5)
# --drop                If specified, drops existing data before inserting new data
#
# Example usage:
# python generate_performance_test_data.py --transactions 10000 --avg-splits 3 --max-splits 7 --drop
#
# This command will:
# 1. Drop existing data from the transactions and transaction_splits tables (if --drop is specified)
# 2. Generate 10,000 random transactions
# 3. For each transaction, generate between 1 and 7 splits, with an average of 3 splits
# 4. Insert all generated data into the database
# 5. Report the time taken to complete the operation
#
# Note: This script uses only existing payees, accounts, and categories from your database.
# Make sure you have some data in these tables before running the script.
#
# The script uses the DATABASE_URI from your config.py file. Make sure this is set correctly before running the script.
#
# After running the script, check the console output for performance metrics and any error messages.

import sqlite3
import random
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import argparse
import logging
from config import DATABASE_URI

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

def get_db_connection():
    return sqlite3.connect(DATABASE_URI.replace('sqlite:///', ''))

def drop_all_data(cursor):
    tables = ['transactions', 'transaction_splits']
    for table in tables:
        cursor.execute(f"DELETE FROM {table};")
    logger.info("All data deleted from transactions and transaction_splits tables.")

def generate_random_date(start_date, end_date):
    time_between_dates = end_date - start_date
    days_between_dates = time_between_dates.days
    random_number_of_days = random.randrange(days_between_dates)
    return start_date + timedelta(days=random_number_of_days)

def get_existing_ids(cursor, table):
    cursor.execute(f"SELECT id FROM {table}")
    return [row[0] for row in cursor.fetchall()]

def generate_transactions(cursor, num_transactions, avg_splits, max_splits):
    start_date = datetime(2020, 1, 1).date()
    end_date = datetime(2023, 12, 31).date()

    payee_ids = get_existing_ids(cursor, 'payees')
    account_ids = get_existing_ids(cursor, 'accounts')
    category_ids = get_existing_ids(cursor, 'categories')

    transactions = []
    splits = []

    for _ in range(num_transactions):
        transaction_date = generate_random_date(start_date, end_date)
        amount = round(random.uniform(1, 1000), 2)
        payee_id = random.choice(payee_ids)
        account_id = random.choice(account_ids)
        description = f"Transaction {_+1}"

        transactions.append((transaction_date, amount, payee_id, account_id, description))

        num_splits = min(max(1, int(random.gauss(avg_splits, 1))), max_splits)
        remaining_amount = amount

        for i in range(num_splits):
            if i == num_splits - 1:
                split_amount = remaining_amount
            else:
                split_amount = round(random.uniform(0.01, remaining_amount - 0.01), 2)

            category_id = random.choice(category_ids)
            splits.append((_ + 1, category_id, split_amount))
            remaining_amount -= split_amount

    return transactions, splits

This file contains a performance test script that generates and inserts a large number of transactions and splits into the database. While it's not a unit test or integration test in the traditional sense, it is a form of performance testing that doesn't belong in the main application code.

As for what's amiss with the tests:

  1. Inconsistent test location: Most tests are correctly placed in the /tests folder, but the performance test script is in the root directory.

  2. Incomplete test coverage: Many of the test files in the /tests folder contain placeholder tests or TODOs. For example:

import pytest
import pandas as pd
from services.import_service import read_csv, apply_field_mapping, validate_data, insert_transactions

def test_read_csv():
    # TODO: Implement test for read_csv function
    pass

def test_apply_field_mapping():
    # TODO: Implement test for apply_field_mapping function
    pass

def test_validate_data():
    # TODO: Implement test for validate_data function
    pass

def test_insert_transactions(mocker):
    # TODO: Implement test for insert_transactions function
    pass

This file has empty test functions that need to be implemented.

  1. Lack of comprehensive test suite: While there are tests for some components (like UI helpers, data operations, and database configuration), there appear to be missing tests for other crucial parts of the application, such as the main Streamlit pages and some of the service layer functions.

  2. No clear separation between unit tests and integration tests: The current test structure doesn't distinguish between unit tests and integration tests, which could make it harder to run different types of tests separately.

  3. Absence of test fixtures or setup/teardown methods: Some tests could benefit from shared fixtures or setup/teardown methods to reduce code duplication and ensure a consistent test environment.

To improve the testing structure and coverage, you should:

axjasf commented 2 hours ago

Closed as all topics have been moved into individual issues