Closed lukebakken closed 2 years ago
Is there any other reason other than historical to prefer RiakSecurityDecoder usage rather then use SslHandler ?
Usage of the built-in handler will simplify our codebase as well as it also simplify further maintenance. as well as it makes our code less "promises'ious" and make it more Netty'ish. I could step on this and refactor our code to use it
UPD Figured out that SslHandler already used under the hood in RiakSecurityDecoder, curious if there any chance to make it more Netty'ish.
@srgg - that may make sense, but is outside the scope of this PR.
Related to basho/riak_api#119