bazelbuild / rules_license

Apache License 2.0
80 stars 28 forks source link

The rules to declare licenses and their kinds should be in a distinct bazel package from the ones that consume them. #85

Open aiuto opened 1 year ago

aiuto commented 1 year ago

There are too many things in the rules package. The expected use case is that everyone is going to by declaring a license rule, but fewer people will be using those to produce license audit or SBOMs. Most of the people who do produce an SBOM are expected to check rules_license into their repo and modify or reuse as appropriate, so having a clear separation between the packages you modify and the ones you leave alone is helpful.

aiuto commented 1 year ago

This is mostly done in 0.0.7. Not closed yet until we delete all the forwarders that were left behind. That should be at 0.0.9.